Ваш браузер устарел.

Для того, чтобы использовать все возможности сайта, загрузите и установите один из этих браузеров.



  • Title


  • Authors

    Oborsky Gennady A.
    Stanovska Iraida I.
    Prokopovich Igor V.
    Tonkonogy Volodymyr М.
    Stanovskyi Olexandr L.

  • Subject


  • Year 2022
    Issue 1(65)
    UDC 004.93.01
    DOI 10.15276/opu.1.65.2022.13
    Pages 109-116
  • Abstract

    Even the simplest design work is performed, as a rule, by a design institution, which involves several designers of different qualifications. Therefore, practically, each design is divided into several design works (subprojects), which are performed sequentially and in parallel with the constant coordination of the impact of individual subprojects. Some elements are not designed in the general sense. Their results are transferred to the list of “purchased” elements and components (fasteners, standard components, etc.). Hence the problem of optimizing such elements with the designed parts and providing the opportunity to directly “buy” them. During the design of the designer there are various surprises or risks that can also significantly change the course and outcome of the design. Therefore, the design must take into account not only the constraints imposed by “internal” circumstances, which are usually unchanged, but also the variable “external” circumstances, which include: constraints arising from the changing operating conditions of the future design object; technological limitations related to the specific capabilities of the organization that will implement the project; financial constraints; time restrictions; etc. Depending on the degree of parallelization of individual design subprocesses, the overall process can be considered as sequential, partially parallel or parallel. Overlapping, these constraints create a unique and whimsical background, creating the preconditions for deepening optimization. Against this background, new models and design objects can be built, such as the cosmogonic model of the Big Bang. The model of the project space description is offered and the possibilities of the latter transformation during the optimization of the design process according to the information model of the “Big Bang” are estimated. The concept of “protomodel” as the first “edition” of multidimensional morphological information model of design process is created and analyzed. The Center for Reconstructive and Reconstructive Medicine conducted tests of the anti-crisis system of designing the optimal process of making design decisions in medical practice. Tests have shown that its use has achieved significant results in terms of quality of care.

  • Keywords models of objects and design processes, optimization of subprojects, “Big Bang”, medical care
  • Viewed: 63 Dowloaded: 4
  • Download Article
  • References


    1. Мала гірнича енциклопедія: у 3 т. / за ред. В. С. Білецького. Д. : Донбас, 2007. Т. 2 . 670 с.

    2. Становська І.І. Компактність динамічної моделі розвитку проектного управління як міра його ефективності. Вісник НТУ «ХПІ», Серія: Нові рішення в сучасних технологіях. 2019. № 10 (1335). С. 70–76.

    3. Голубков Е.П. Прогнозні моделі, засновані на методах математичної статистики. Маркетинг для професіоналів. 2014. URL: https://stud.com.ua/62987/marketing/prognozni_modeli_zasnovani_ metodah_matematichnoyi_statistiki. (Дата звернення 12.01.22).

    4. Йолон П. Пізнавальні здатності. Філософський енциклопедичний словник. Київ : Абрис, 2002. 742 с.

    5. Белощицкий А.А. Модель расширяющейся вселенной проектов в управлении образовательными средами. Восточно-европейский журнал передовых технологий. 2012. № 1/11 (55). С. 41 – 43.

    6. Даве В., Кестел Д. Руководство к Своду знаний по управлению проектами (Руководство PMBOK). Пятое издание. Project Management Institute. 2013. 614 с.

    7. Wollack, Edward J. Cosmology: The Study of the Universe. Universe 101: Big Bang Theory. NASA (10 December 2010).

    8. Бушуев С.Д., Бушуев Д.А., Ярошенко Р.Ф. (2017). Деформация поля компетенций в инновационных проектах. Вісник національного технічного університету «ХПІ». Збірник наукових праць. Серія: Стратегічне управління, управління портфелями, програмами та проектами. 2017. № 2 (1224). С. 3–7.

    9. Вайсман В.А., Гогунський В.Д., Руденко С.В. Теория проектно-ориентованого управления: обоснование закона Бушуева С.Д. Наук. записки Міжнар. гуманітарного ун-ту: Зб. 2009. С. 9–13. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/283349667_TEORIA_PROEKTNO_ORIENTIROVANOGO_ UPRAVLENIA_OBOSNOVANIE_ZAKONA_BUSUEVA_SD.

    10. Колеснікова К.В. Розвиток теорії проектного управління: обґрунтування закону ініціації проектів. Управління розвитком складних систем. 2014. № 17. С. 24–30. URL: http://mdcs.knuba. edu.ua/article/view/38688/ 35053.

    11. Pichler Roman. Agile Product Management with Scrum: Creating Products that Customers Love. Upper Saddle River, NJ : Addison-Wesley. 2010. 133 p.

    12. Scott, Ambler. Going Beyond Scrum: Disciplined Agile Delivery. 2013. Resources/Documents/ BeyondScrum.pdf. URL: https://www.disciplinedagileconsortium.org/.

    13. Sutherland Jeff. The Scrum Papers: Nut, Bolts, and Origins of an Agile Framework. Available: www.Scruminc.com. Accessed on: April 2, 2012.

    14. Корзаченко О.В. Оптимізація бізнес-процесів українських підприємств: проблеми та перспективи. Науковий вісник Херсонського державного університету. Економічні науки. 2013. № 3. С. 64–69. URL: http://www.irbis-nbuv.gov.ua/cgi-bin/irbis_nbuv/cgiirbis_64.exe?I21DBN= LINK&P21DBN=UJRN&Z21ID=&S21REF=10&S21CNR=20&S21STN=1&S21FMT=ASP_meta&C21COM=S&2_S21P03=FILA=&2_S21STR=Nvkhdu_en_2013_3_17

    15. Становська І.І., Колеснікова К.В. (2019). Стратифікація індивідуальних компетенцій з метою побудови динамічних морфологічних моделей проектного управління. Вісник НТУ «ХПІ». Серія: Стратегічне управління, управління портфелями, програмами та проектами. 2019. № 1 (1326). С. 30–36.



    1. Biletsky, V.S. (Eds.). (2007). Small mining encyclopedia: in 3 volumes. D.: Donbas, V. 2.

    2. Stanovska, I.I. (2019). Compactness of dynamic model of project management development as a measure of its efficiency. Bulletin of NTU “KhPI”, Series: New solutions in modern technologies, 10(1335), 70–76.

    3. Golubk, E.P. Predictive models based on the methods of mathematical statistics. Marketing for professionals. Retrieved from: https://stud.com.ua/62987/marketing/prognozni_modeli_zasnovani_metodah_matematichnoyi_ statistiki (Last access 12.01.22.)

    4. Yolon, P. (2002). Cognitive abilities. Philosophical encyclopedic dictionary. Kyiv: Abris.

    5. Beloshchitsky, A.A. (2012). A model of an expanding universe of projects in the management of educational environments. Eastern European Journal of Advanced Technology, 1/11 (55), 41–43.

    6. Dave, W., & Kestel, D. (2013). Project Management Knowledge Handbook (PMBOK Guide). Fifth edition. Project Management Institute.

    7. Wollack, Edward J. (2010). Cosmology: The Study of the Universe. Universe 101: Big Bang Theory. NASA (10 December 2010).

    8. Bushuev, S.D., Bushuev, D.A., & Yaroshenko, R.F. (2017). Deformation of the field of competencies in innovative projects. Bulletin of the National Technical University "KhPI". Collection of scientific works. Series: Strategic management, portfolio management, programs and projects, 2 (1224), 3–7.

    9. Vaysman, V.A. Gogunsky, V.D., & Rudenko, S.V. (2009) Theory of project-oriented management: substantiation of the law of Bushuev S. D. Science Notes International University of Humanities: Coll., 9–13. Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/283349667_TEORIA_PROEKTNO_ ORIENTIROVANOGO_UPRAVLENIA_OBOSNOVANIE_ZAKONA_BUSUEVA_SD.

    10. Kolesnikova, K.V. (2014). Development of project management theory: substantiation of the project initiation law. Management of the development of complex systems, 17, 24–30. Retrieved from: http://mdcs.knuba.edu.ua/article/view/38688/35053.

    11. Pichler, Roman. (2010). Agile Product Management with Scrum: Creating Products that Customers Love. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Addison-Wesley.

    12. Scott, Ambler. (2013). Going Beyond Scrum: Disciplined Agile Delivery. Resources/Documents/ BeyondScrum.pdf. Retrieved from: https://www.disciplinedagileconsortium.org/.

    13. Sutherland, Jeff. The Scrum Papers: Nut, Bolts, and Origins of an Agile Framework. Retrieved from: www.Scruminc.com.

    14. Korzachenko, O.V. (2013). Optimization of business processes of Ukrainian enterprises: problems and prospects. Scientific Bulletin of Kherson State University. Economic sciences, 3, 64–69. Retrieved from: http://www.irbis-nbuv.gov.ua/cgi-bin/irbis_nbuv/cgiirbis_64.exe?I21DBN=LINK&P21DBN= UJRN&Z21ID=&S21REF=10&S21CNR=20&S21STN=1&S21FMT=ASP_meta&C21COM=S&2_S21P03=FILA=&2_S21STR=Nvkhdu_en_2013_3_17.

    15. Stanovskaya, I.I, & Kolesnikova, K.V. (2019). Stratification of individual competencies in order to build dynamic morphological models of project management. Bulletin of NTU “KhPI”. Series: Strategic management, portfolio management, programs and projects, 1 (1326), 30–36.

  • Creative Commons License by Author(s)